🔗 Share this article

Whenever a major prize-giving event approaches, you'll find a clamor for the addition of new categories to acknowledge overlooked contributions and delight the passions of fans dedicated to specific genres.

Another commentator previously argued for a horror game category. It would be amazing. The same goes for strategy board titles, which is a dedicated supporter's campaign. However, I must insist if I try to elbow in front since similar to dedicated enthusiasts, I have a cast-iron argument for why my demand stands as crucial above others. This is the request: We need a classification for brain-teasing titles.

Categorizing Game Types

Classifying creative works defies precise measurement; opinions vary greatly, and it will always start arguments resulting in unclear classifications. This explains why film award organizations don’t do it. Yet it remains an essential concession within the realm of interactive entertainment, showing incredible range it's challenging to consider them a single creative category.

For comprehensive acknowledgment of achievement in video games to receive acknowledgment, and to ensure all game types to compete fairly, classification by type becomes crucial.

Present Award Structure

The major gaming awards presently include classifications covering Action-oriented games, Adventure-action titles, Role-Playing, Fighting, Simulation and strategy titles, plus athletic and racing experiences. Collectively, these six categories effectively encompass numerous genres, making space possible for most games within them.

This doesn't apply to puzzle games. No appropriate category exists to put them. Think about these this year’s best games, showing diverse approaches: structural challenges from a specific release, fast-paced pattern recognition of another game, thought-provoking social scenarios of a third title. What category would fit them within current classifications? Nowhere, that’s where.

Recognition Challenges

Many instances occur outstanding logic titles published annually without proper recognition at major award shows, unless they happen to qualify for categories like Mobile Game, Virtual reality experiences, or the extremely competitive small studio competitions.

• One classic puzzle game received no recognition in any category that year
• Another creative title received no nominations during that ceremony
• Popular arranging title received no acknowledgment in 2021
• Limited numbers of brain-teasers managed to sneak into niche award types

Value of Brain-Teasers

These are often modest productions, yet the craft behind logic titles holds tremendous importance. Well-known matching games rank among the most-played games globally maintaining this status for many years.

The iconic tile-matching title competes with famous sandbox experiences competing to become best-selling game of all time; it additionally competes for best game of all time. Brain-teasers form essential building blocks within interactive entertainment, while interacting with diverse game types.

Proposal and Rationale

Puzzle games wouldn’t have that issue. You could fill multiple candidates engaging, different, qualified experiences each ceremony simply — perhaps, with difficulty, because you’d have to leave many worthy titles.

And to reiterate, these include experiences that otherwise have no home at major gaming awards. Puzzle game makers operate at the hard edge of video game design, producing among essential manifestations of the video game form. Similar to movie stunt professionals, they merit acknowledgment. Let’s not keep them waiting 35 years.